Clever and entertaining, but its core premise — that preventing God's apocalypse is heroic — is a direct theological inversion Christians should engage critically.
Good Omens is built on a premise with real theological stakes: its two protagonists decide that preventing God's plan for the world is the heroic act. God is depicted as absent, arbitrary, or uncaring — not the God of Scripture. The resolution — that the ineffable plan is subverted by friendship — is emotionally satisfying and theologically backwards. Isaiah 55:8-9's declaration that God's ways are higher than ours is what Good Omens essentially argues against.
Season 2 introduces a romantic storyline between Aziraphale and Crowley — two male characters — as a central narrative thread. Season 1 is theological-adjacent satire; Season 2 is more explicitly LGBT-affirming with theological framing. The combined score of 22/100 reflects the full series.
GodlyScore evaluates every show across nine signal categories grounded in Scripture: profanity (Ephesians 4:29), sexual content (1 Corinthians 6:18-20), violence (Psalm 11:5), LGBT normalization (Romans 1:24-27), spiritual darkness (Ephesians 5:11), glorification of sin (Romans 1:32), deception mechanics (Proverbs 12:22), virtue strength (Philippians 4:8), and redemption arc. The score reflects not just whether content is present but how it's framed — depicted critically, neutrally, or as aspirational. Good Omens scores 1/100 Avoid.
See our Christian TV Reviews hub for comparisons. For episode-level content breakdowns, Plugged In and Common Sense Media complement GodlyScore's biblical framework. Age recommendation: mature adults only.